Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44C5210CC6 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11752 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2013 17:57:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 11612 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2013 17:57:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 11603 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2013 17:57:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:57:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy includes SPF record at spf.trusted-forwarder.org) Received: from [173.201.193.104] (HELO p3plsmtpa08-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net) (173.201.193.104) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 17:57:18 +0000 Received: from hub ([76.252.112.72]) by p3plsmtpa08-03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with id j5wu1m00V1Zmh9Y015wvyu; Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:56:56 -0700 Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 12:56:52 -0500 From: "William A. Rowe Jr." To: Gregg Smith Cc: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: Timetable for APR 1.5 release? Message-ID: <20131029125652.30f40f65@hub> In-Reply-To: <526FF113.6030108@gknw.net> References: <5260A63B.20301@gknw.net> <5262C226.4020509@gknw.net> <526E95EA.6020304@gknw.net> <20131028155411.0fc3ea12@hub> <20131028163753.55c73a47@hub> <526F08AA.8080808@gknw.net> <20131029110049.31480661@hub> <526FF113.6030108@gknw.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 10:32:03 -0700 Gregg Smith wrote: > > Suggestion - should we simply use the CROSS_COMPILE path when > > building for win32 .dsp/.mak files, instead? > You mean using the CMake and dropping the "Traditional build" > completely? -1 > I currently do not see the problem with having both at this time. Of > course, I am only one voice here. Once 1.5 is tagged I do not forsee > any further problems arising since this should all be set in stone > till 1.next/2.0. Nope - simply /DCROSS_COMPILE in the [lib]apr.dsp/.mak files rather than pre-copying apr.h. I don't think that using apr feature detection and headers buys us anything in compiling code which should 'just work' on any compiler still in use in this century :) ... I meant this strictly for gen_test_char.c source, of course.