Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF3D710B95 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 18:15:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27298 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2013 18:14:35 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 26817 invoked by uid 500); 17 Sep 2013 18:14:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 26633 invoked by uid 99); 17 Sep 2013 18:14:20 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 18:14:20 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.174] (HELO m1plsmtpa01-02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.174) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 18:14:13 +0000 Received: from hub ([76.252.112.72]) by m1plsmtpa01-02.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net with id SJDV1m00Z1Zmh9Y01JDWiv; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 11:13:31 -0700 Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 13:13:27 -0500 From: "William A. Rowe Jr." To: Timo Rothenpieler Cc: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: Using UNIX domain sockets with apr Message-ID: <20130917131327.0b30e785@hub> In-Reply-To: <522E1C3A.2030806@rothenpieler.org> References: <522E1C3A.2030806@rothenpieler.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.0 (GTK+ 2.24.13; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, 09 Sep 2013 21:06:34 +0200 Timo Rothenpieler wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to use unix sockets with the apr socket functions, but it > seems like it doesn't support that. > In the current trunk there's an APR_UNIX define, which comes with > additional code to make the socket api support unix sockets. > > The commits it's in (745763 and 745764) are from 2009, but don't > appear to be in any release or at least release branch. > > Would it be possible to merge these patches to 1.4 and 1.5, so it's in > the next releases? > Or do I miss the right way to use unix sockets without these patches? According to our versioning policy, no. It's possible that this could appear in a 1.6.0 release if that happens before 2.0.0 is released.