Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9DF90105E8 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:37:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 33206 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2013 12:37:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 32889 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2013 12:37:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 32881 invoked by uid 99); 29 Aug 2013 12:37:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:37:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of covener@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.45] (HELO mail-vb0-f45.google.com) (209.85.212.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 12:37:11 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id e15so241871vbg.4 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 05:36:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=X0VWF4ngRJ/HWYB3tyamf/8r0ExP+fCs4iwGOeyi3tM=; b=HDJsXS29T7gPFbqcgn+zslrMhOk3V9NcZZ7NVzDcQz3HoDXY99WHmVz2h2UppLwWMQ tD1YbKOuY6YhpdpHhZtpBiTWLgnB23rRCgaEziF7KJ8NqNVNEvHxl7G5UKMWTzAXabq/ 2uVnD6Qkd6uTt5Bkm+KQmB/AoHEq/LejOsQ09KFUBS6JijYsNEGPsVsBMzSAr3FCXnRI KMjI5eJGp/FZOz6inDDNphPxceMmJIvSGg6mAdgRXcPQ6T56Rd0GiBxIofLB7aKaQ+NU FpIgJi6cTeEGecfxOdMI4GmFr3cvU0+XumHoG+9pbfZbu8GyraZtZoRARDcZZRlAorBc OUgw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.42.140 with SMTP id s12mr119260vce.33.1377779810864; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 05:36:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.49.33 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Aug 2013 05:36:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 08:36:50 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Any objections to committing cmake builds for Windows to the stable branches? From: Eric Covener To: APR Developer List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote: > With something easily visible like README.cmake containing appropriate > disclaimers?* > > I suspect that build bugs are likely to be found more quickly with the > stable branches just because it fits into more applications and/or workflows > (i.e., more people). no objection here