apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de>
Subject Re: Merge the new apr_hash_this_{key,key_len,val} to 1.5
Date Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12:21:27 GMT
On 23.01.2013 16:19, Julian Foad wrote:
> Dear APR devs,
> Please can we merge the these functions from trunk [1,2] to the next version to be released,
which I assume would mean the 1.5 branch, before it's released, as originally discussed at
>   const char * apr_hash_this_key(apr_hash_index_t *);
>   apr_ssize_t  apr_hash_this_key_len(apr_hash_index_t *);
>   void *       apr_hash_this_val(apr_hash_index_t *);
> The Apache Subversion code base already implements and extensively uses an equivalent
API [4], and I anticipate Subversion would switch to using these new APR functions soon after
they become available (using fallbacks when linking to older APR versions).
> Note: Just before sending this, I sent a patch to simplify and constify these functions.
 It would be best to apply that patch before merging to 1.5 if that patch is accepted.
> Let me know if I can help with this.  I can commit the merge myself, for example, if
you approve me to do so.  (Likewise, the commit of the other patch.)
> - Julian
> [1] tracked as: <https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49065>
> [2] committed as: <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=931973>
> [3] discussed at: <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-dev/201003.mbox/%3C4B96A8EF.8030401%40rowe-clan.net%3E>
in the thread found at <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-dev/201003.mbox/browser>;
search for "[PATCH] apr_hash_this_{key,klen,val}".
> [4] The equivalent API in Subversion uses longer names for the functions and an implementation
that simply wraps apr_hash_this().  The code can be seen at e.g. <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/tags/1.7.8/subversion/include/svn_types.h?annotate=1387206#l164>
and <http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/tags/1.7.8/subversion/libsvn_subr/iter.c?annotate=1387206#l185>.

Unfortunately the APR versioning rules do not allow addition of new
functions to APU 1.5.x. We can put it into 1.6, but there's not yet a
1.6 release branch or plan.



View raw message