apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Felt <mamf...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: make check issues with AIX - willing to help but will need assistance to be efficient
Date Thu, 20 Sep 2012 15:41:40 GMT
michael@x054:[/data/prj/apr/apr-util-1.4.1/test]stxlate
testbuckets          <
teststrmatch        : SUCCESS
testuri             : SUCCESS
testuuid            : SUCCESS
testpass            : SUCCESS
testmd4             : SUCCESS
testmd5             : SUCCESS
testcrypto          : SUCCESS
testdbd             : SUCCESS
testdate            : SUCCESS
testmemcache        : SUCCESS
testxml             : SUCCESS
testrmm             : SUCCESS
testdbm             : SUCCESS
testqueue           : SUCCESS
testreslist         : SUCCESS
All tests passed.

michael@x054:[/data/prj/apr/apr-util-1.4.1/test]stxlate
testbuckets          <
teststrmatch        : SUCCESS
testuri             : SUCCESS
testuuid            : SUCCESS
testpass            : SUCCESS
testmd4             : SUCCESS
testmd5             : SUCCESS
testcrypto          : SUCCESS
testdbd             : SUCCESS
testdate            : SUCCESS
testmemcache        : SUCCESS
testxml             : SUCCESS
testrmm             : SUCCESS
testdbm             : SUCCESS
testqueue           : SUCCESS
testreslist         : SUCCESS
All tests passed.

So testxlate and testbuckets fail on a "user" system, no dev stuff
installed.

If I get different results on the dev server I'll update.


On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Michael Felt <mamfelt@gmail.com> wrote:

> if testdbd is first, seems to have passed, but I shall try the -x option
> as soon as I get the development server turned on again.
>
> If it is happening elsewhere, then maybe it is not just IBM's way of doing
> iconv.
>
> It looks like a segmentation error after a pipe call to /bin/sh. I was
> thinking, once I know where to look, to do the iconv command manually
> and/or as a regular script and see if that tells me/i.e., you, anything
> useful to determine the cause.
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Guenter Knauf <fuankg@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Michael,
>> Am 20.09.2012 10:34, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
>>
>>  Am 20.09.2012 08:53, schrieb Michael Felt:
>>>
>>>> Yes, unfortunately? or fortunately!
>>>>
>>> hehe, I would say fortunately since that makes it no regression and
>>> therefore your issue might not be something to hold back 1.5.1 ;-)
>>>
>> of course this doesnt mean that we shouldnt look into it; BTW. this test
>> fails on NetWare too, so seems its a bit picky, whatever ...
>> best is that you exclude this test for now so that you can proceed with
>> testing in order to see what else fails; testdbd did also fail, or?
>> then try:
>> aputest -x testdbd -x testxlate
>>
>> Gün.
>>
>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message