apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Felt <mamf...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: make check issues with AIX - willing to help but will need assistance to be efficient
Date Thu, 20 Sep 2012 16:52:31 GMT
On the dev (x104) system, running as root - testbuckets succeeds; rerunning
on x054, as root, testbuckets also succeeds.

So, only testxlate is (still) standing in the way.

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Michael Felt <mamfelt@gmail.com> wrote:

> cut/paste killed the "command"
>
> $ ./testall -x testxlate testbuckets
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Michael Felt <mamfelt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> michael@x054:[/data/prj/apr/apr-util-1.4.1/test]stxlate
>> testbuckets          <
>> teststrmatch        : SUCCESS
>> testuri             : SUCCESS
>> testuuid            : SUCCESS
>> testpass            : SUCCESS
>> testmd4             : SUCCESS
>> testmd5             : SUCCESS
>> testcrypto          : SUCCESS
>> testdbd             : SUCCESS
>>
>> testdate            : SUCCESS
>> testmemcache        : SUCCESS
>> testxml             : SUCCESS
>> testrmm             : SUCCESS
>> testdbm             : SUCCESS
>> testqueue           : SUCCESS
>> testreslist         : SUCCESS
>> All tests passed.
>>
>> michael@x054:[/data/prj/apr/apr-util-1.4.1/test]stxlate
>> testbuckets          <
>> teststrmatch        : SUCCESS
>> testuri             : SUCCESS
>> testuuid            : SUCCESS
>> testpass            : SUCCESS
>> testmd4             : SUCCESS
>> testmd5             : SUCCESS
>> testcrypto          : SUCCESS
>> testdbd             : SUCCESS
>>
>> testdate            : SUCCESS
>> testmemcache        : SUCCESS
>> testxml             : SUCCESS
>> testrmm             : SUCCESS
>> testdbm             : SUCCESS
>> testqueue           : SUCCESS
>> testreslist         : SUCCESS
>> All tests passed.
>>
>> So testxlate and testbuckets fail on a "user" system, no dev stuff
>> installed.
>>
>> If I get different results on the dev server I'll update.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Michael Felt <mamfelt@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> if testdbd is first, seems to have passed, but I shall try the -x option
>>> as soon as I get the development server turned on again.
>>>
>>> If it is happening elsewhere, then maybe it is not just IBM's way of
>>> doing iconv.
>>>
>>> It looks like a segmentation error after a pipe call to /bin/sh. I was
>>> thinking, once I know where to look, to do the iconv command manually
>>> and/or as a regular script and see if that tells me/i.e., you, anything
>>> useful to determine the cause.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 10:48 AM, Guenter Knauf <fuankg@apache.org>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Michael,
>>>> Am 20.09.2012 10:34, schrieb Guenter Knauf:
>>>>
>>>>  Am 20.09.2012 08:53, schrieb Michael Felt:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, unfortunately? or fortunately!
>>>>>>
>>>>> hehe, I would say fortunately since that makes it no regression and
>>>>> therefore your issue might not be something to hold back 1.5.1 ;-)
>>>>>
>>>> of course this doesnt mean that we shouldnt look into it; BTW. this
>>>> test fails on NetWare too, so seems its a bit picky, whatever ...
>>>> best is that you exclude this test for now so that you can proceed with
>>>> testing in order to see what else fails; testdbd did also fail, or?
>>>> then try:
>>>> aputest -x testdbd -x testxlate
>>>>
>>>> Gün.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Mime
View raw message