> -----Original Message-----
> From: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net]
> Sent: zondag 12 augustus 2012 19:40
> To: dev@apr.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release apr-util 1.5.0
> 
> On 8/10/2012 1:05 PM, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > Thanks for the detailed tests.
> >
> > On Friday 10 August 2012, Rainer Jung wrote:
> >> If you don't need to release before, I would like to fix the LDADD
> >> use over the weekend, but it is not a show stopper.
> >
> > It seems I will be busy in the next few days. It is unlikely that I
> > T&R 1.5.1 before next Wednesday.
> >
> >> Another nice to have would be an expat update to 2.1.0.
> >
> > Has anyone looked into this before and knows how much work this is?
> 
> I have an alternate suggestion as of 1.5 - to drop our embedded expat
> just as we did in trunk.  Require the user to obtain the (now once
> again maintained) expat package.
> 
> > Another nice to have fix would be support for newer Berkley DB
> > versions (PR 53684).
> 
> And I'd also like to incorporate the rfc implementation of punycode
> encode/decode for use by any i18n domain features of our consumers,
> such as httpd or even client apps.  Would anyone mind, if I can get
> this into the tree by tuesday aftn?  As 1.5.0 wasn't released, I don't
> think the binary compatibility is an issue just yet.

Ping?
Any update on the punycode support?

I'm not really part of the apr(-util) project, but I would like to see a new release after the failed 1.4.2 attempt months ago.

	Bert