From dev-return-24862-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Mon Apr 9 18:35:00 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4A82D9899 for ; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 18:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 82547 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2012 18:34:59 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 82480 invoked by uid 500); 9 Apr 2012 18:34:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 82471 invoked by uid 99); 9 Apr 2012 18:34:59 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 18:34:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of trawick@gmail.com designates 209.85.220.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.220.178] (HELO mail-vx0-f178.google.com) (209.85.220.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 18:34:54 +0000 Received: by vcbgb30 with SMTP id gb30so3123937vcb.37 for ; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 11:34:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Bu2gnhzIlTS2Rv7fPZm8fPvQE4jPjGeMPkKAnOWwSH8=; b=a3R71x5tuNHR2r8qZaxj0lE+v9DHYrvF7X8nG10n6J0VvblPUHn+q5AfixcIXiJX9Z f3gsRZ4x8ZNgGtkf8g+WhbbhnyPyBoqojvVpTJfggxUCxrdBM5/CFZx5SGaYHsGWZCOz v2lDx2Zc8WkNSB3SS9/onXlsC0Q+HKyjPz2sahgfwtkGGPcfGjJxUAyii1oZMOeSz1qc 3pxFEkWgAjSxnh3QZFKvud3QwjQu4S0rUKHkT0pYIsrx+9/ByyS/SOWHD970qCA4y6dh YLMlW5xYIduf65vGACZe6ECdVwJzbcDdFUnI7U+Pl95Tg41fVCGQnoGSWaQx89+ihiHv FXxA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.22.148 with SMTP id d20mr3353133vdf.102.1333996473910; Mon, 09 Apr 2012 11:34:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.215.3 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Apr 2012 11:34:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F8327C9.4050008@rowe-clan.net> References: <4F8292C3.2000805@kippdata.de> <201204091804.41974.sf@sfritsch.de> <4F8327C9.4050008@rowe-clan.net> Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 14:34:33 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: backports/merges From: Jeff Trawick To: dev@apr.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:17 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. w= rote: > On 4/9/2012 11:04 AM, Stefan Fritsch wrote: >> On Monday 09 April 2012, Rainer Jung wrote: >>>> Do you disagree with the procedure and/or my attempt to describe >>>> the "normal" way this is handled? >>> >>> No, I agree and I think it is more useful to include the CHANGES >>> entry =A0in the backport commit than to split it in a second commit. >>> At least that's what I tried to do in the past influenced by >>> following the list and commit messages. Sometimes the CHANGES >>> entry either is forgotten during the backport commit or postponed >>> by a differing personal preference and is then added soon as a >>> separate commit which I think is less useful but still acceptable. >> >> +1 > > +1; and ++1 for formalizing this at apr.a.o/dev/ I'll do that. (No, really!)