apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Stefan Fritsch ...@sfritsch.de>
Subject Re: backports/merges
Date Mon, 09 Apr 2012 16:04:41 GMT
On Monday 09 April 2012, Rainer Jung wrote:
> > Do you disagree with the procedure and/or my attempt to describe
> > the "normal" way this is handled?
> No, I agree and I think it is more useful to include the CHANGES
> entry  in the backport commit than to split it in a second commit.
> At least that's what I tried to do in the past influenced by
> following the list and commit messages. Sometimes the CHANGES
> entry either is forgotten during the backport commit or postponed
> by a differing personal preference and is then added soon as a
> separate commit which I think is less useful but still acceptable.


View raw message