Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of trawick@gmail.com designates
 209.85.214.50 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4F2986E1.4040707@kippdata.de>
References: <4F295537.8070103@schor.com>
	<CAKUrXK5nk7eZXs_s8LAjh_2Qgxm0AuChDVQ5NKfGnNcU0bDf8A@mail.gmail.com>
	<4F2986E1.4040707@kippdata.de>
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 19:23:06 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAKUrXK50mZkGpK3=P_0PBsPwwsPrRPgdVkGY3xBm8gaNZBChzw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Export control for APR-Util version 1.3.8
From: Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com>
To: dev@apr.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Rainer Jung <rainer.jung@kippdata.de> wrote=
:
> On 01.02.2012 18:59, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Marshall Schor<msa@schor.com> =A0wrote:
>>>
>>> On the exports page ( http://www.apache.org/licenses/exports/ ) this
>>> version
>>> of APR-Util is not listed, although other versions are.
>>>
>>> Is this correct? =A0We are relying on this to avoid adding a package we
>>> plan
>>> to distribute to the exports page.
>>>
>>> -Marshall Schor
>>
>>
>> The "n/a" line should be changed to include 1.3.x as well. =A0Agreed
>> (APR developers)?
>
>
> +1 based on similarity with 1.2.
>
> In addition APR itself is only listed with "development", bit no info on
> 0.9, ..., 1.4. Would that also be n/a or 5D002? Don't know whether the
> ability to build something on top of APR suffices for 5D002. Guess no, bu=
t
> ...

APR: 0.9.x, 1.x: n/a

BTW, can anyone remind me where this file is edited?

>
> Regards,
>
> Rainer


--=20
Born in Roswell... married an alien...