apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Oscar Pernas <os...@pernas.es>
Subject Re: redefinition uid_t
Date Tue, 18 Oct 2011 21:54:07 GMT
Hi Jeff,

Thanks for your response. Im also having one more error with this structure:

struct iovec
    void *iov_base;
    size_t iov_len;

Its weird because, the preprocessor definition APR_WANT_IOVEC is not defined
in the project, and in all the projects that I use and uses apr (log4cxx,
activemqcpp...). I'd added a personal preprocessor definition and now it
compiles, but, could cause any problem?


2011/10/18 Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com>

> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Oscar Pernas <oscar@pernas.es> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > I'm using apr in a process that uses CORBA TAO, for communications. My
> > problem is that TAO and APR has the same redefinition of a variable.
> > In apr.h i can see:
> > typedef int uid_t ;
> > typedef int pid_t;
> > typedef int gid_t;
> > However in TAO I could see:
> > typedef long uid_t
> > typedef long pid_t
> >
> > Im in Win32 and Win64 platform. I've commented it in apr source and
> library
> > compiles well, Could I have any problem? What would be the best solution?
> I think that's the best solution for now.  APR doesn't actually need
> to define uid_t for its own purposes.
> That general issue -- defining Unix types -- should be be fixed in the
> next major (i.e., not binary compatible) release.  In cases other than
> uid_t there may be other fallout to handle.  For example, apr_proc_t
> uses (requires) pid_t.
> According to our API compatibility rules, something equivalent to
> typedef whatever uid_t
> #endif
> could be provided with apr 1.5.x.  That would be worthwhile if the fix
> could be near-complete.  (I dunno the complete fallout.)

Óscar Pernas Plaza.

View raw message