Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C7E6773C7 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 14:54:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48404 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2011 14:54:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 48316 invoked by uid 500); 10 Sep 2011 14:54:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 48307 invoked by uid 99); 10 Sep 2011 14:54:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 14:54:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of trawick@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.50] (HELO mail-bw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.214.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 14:54:09 +0000 Received: by bkbc12 with SMTP id c12so2807749bkb.37 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 07:53:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KlHIYKY3UmlU6xke3PoS9xtg7aSirO8sIO0Np6DrXiE=; b=FLlE8ujMmVXYsM62u2mG0pExcKGOvK+54FEBY4MpVOydjpYSqscbRidFFW9p4rCdUc QDVFoZYot5UNzhtgRbJAuaTtgrrjS2kEUqStpXumS29REvOYgZrZQMo8ctadEb+JEGX7 bssALdrF5kjVs7lPkkzHomRXwHA/+m9AJSO+c= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.3.23 with SMTP id 23mr580588bkl.301.1315666427726; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 07:53:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.205.81.134 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Sep 2011 07:53:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E6B5F7D.1090601@rowe-clan.net> References: <4E5EA4A2.9060708@rowe-clan.net> <4E5EE507.9050603@rowe-clan.net> <4E640928.4060603@rowe-clan.net> <4E668FA1.4010803@rowe-clan.net> <4E6B5F7D.1090601@rowe-clan.net> Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2011 10:53:47 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Appropriate patches for 2.2.19 and 2.0.64? From: Jeff Trawick To: dev@apr.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 9:00 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > On 9/6/2011 4:24 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: >> On 9/6/2011 9:01 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote: >>> >>> I can take care of T&R of APR 0.9.20 in a couple of days provided that >>> someone first gets CVE-2011-1928 resolved in that branch. >> >> That's already done for some time now; >> >> =A0 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/apr/apr/branches/0.9.x/strings/ >> >> although I still need to update CHANGES already. > > Now changed, and rechecked our merged rev. =A0This looks good to go > if you would like to move forwards. I'll plan to get started looking for concerns and rolling in time to have candidates available before I leave for Redwood Shores early Monday. > > Did anyone else have immediate concerns for this 0.9 branch? > >> I hadn't attempted to port fnmatch tests to CuTest, if anyone is >> interested in doing so, be my guest. > > No interest in porting, here, I don't see a whole lot of reasons > to do so as the code is effectively identical. > Maybe I'll hack something up just quick enough to check for mortal embarrassment. (A bit of cut and paste and #define should suffice.) --=20 Born in Roswell... married an alien...