apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Appropriate patches for 2.2.19 and 2.0.64?
Date Mon, 12 Sep 2011 00:18:47 GMT
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 9:00 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
>> On 9/6/2011 4:24 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>>> On 9/6/2011 9:01 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I can take care of T&R of APR 0.9.20 in a couple of days provided that
>>>> someone first gets CVE-2011-1928 resolved in that branch.
>>>
>>> That's already done for some time now;
>>>
>>>   http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/apr/apr/branches/0.9.x/strings/
>>>
>>> although I still need to update CHANGES already.
>>
>> Now changed, and rechecked our merged rev.  This looks good to go
>> if you would like to move forwards.
>
> I'll plan to get started looking for concerns and rolling in time to
> have candidates available before I leave for Redwood Shores early
> Monday.

err, add 1 day to that estimate :(

>
>>
>> Did anyone else have immediate concerns for this 0.9 branch?
>>
>>> I hadn't attempted to port fnmatch tests to CuTest, if anyone is
>>> interested in doing so, be my guest.
>>
>> No interest in porting, here, I don't see a whole lot of reasons
>> to do so as the code is effectively identical.
>>
>
> Maybe I'll hack something up just quick enough to check for mortal
> embarrassment.  (A bit of cut and paste and #define should suffice.)
>
>
> --
> Born in Roswell... married an alien...
>



-- 
Born in Roswell... married an alien...

Mime
View raw message