Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4182B859C for ; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:02:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 47914 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2011 14:02:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 47680 invoked by uid 500); 8 Aug 2011 14:02:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 47672 invoked by uid 99); 8 Aug 2011 14:02:14 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 14:02:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bojan@rexursive.com designates 150.101.121.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [150.101.121.179] (HELO beauty.rexursive.com) (150.101.121.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 14:02:08 +0000 Received: from [10.1.120.43] (noknok.rexursive.com [10.1.120.43]) by beauty.rexursive.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F182B1A02F5; Tue, 9 Aug 2011 00:01:45 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: svn commit: r1154890 - in /apr/apr-util/branches/1.5.x: ./ buckets/apr_brigade.c build/apu-conf.m4 misc/apr_queue.c xml/expat/ Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2011 00:01:40 +1000 From: "Bojan Smojver" To: trawick@gmail.com Cc: dev@apr.apache.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: LCG ProfiMail 3.48 Message-ID: <9359065682.997315300@rexursive.com> References: <20110808093305.A8B7123889B3@eris.apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed ------- Original message ------- > From: Jeff Trawick > Is the end result that the test previously failed to find > ldap_set_rebind_proc() but now works with GCC 4.6? If so, that's what > CHANGES should say. (We quietly fix warnings all the time; my > semi-educated guess is that this is more interesting.) That was the intention of the change, yes (whether it will work universally remains to be seen, of course). I noticed that on my own F-15 system - it failed to find that the function had 3 arguments. I can change the changes file if you like. -- Bojan