Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 043E74B61 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:09:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20908 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 12:09:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 20821 invoked by uid 500); 19 May 2011 12:09:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 20813 invoked by uid 99); 19 May 2011 12:09:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:09:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of trawick@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.50] (HELO mail-bw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.214.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 12:09:10 +0000 Received: by bwz2 with SMTP id 2so2912412bwz.37 for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 05:08:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ypPLXT7xNBpFNMEIaUOGipJS1ge4FUZ97+NyRvmLdic=; b=D5BbaXXXamWxVnxGoH9Lj6ELMIR8IfNgTBM1KnVMDGXjjdf1izNs2FgevIXjDw2nfB ustnbHd1ohBLftULiT7X42/3ZDw1vUD791b5gVP3oe2ZWwv2JXnAKdVCjU8ErjFqVnkE 0VyfNi+xDKNErq+i+z8KhuT6ltgtnWdVbE7lg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=U2/QES4fnEGN+JTRBIKtF3oA1nzijJbiqTdkWhOz+eubmx2DdXd+8u6VOERANy2P9k aW3ZVrir6RQshShQJcYkLHEXCbmd64DBh6BT9AQTenn7vj17dw+OfhREc3mPSEKS5Gwi HaTSXxpkCTp/gNQBrNJk3CY7PCm2/di8wDB1E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.33.193 with SMTP id i1mr1049018bkd.90.1305806929835; Thu, 19 May 2011 05:08:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.59.212 with HTTP; Thu, 19 May 2011 05:08:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DD415A3.4070103@gmx.de> References: <4DD415A3.4070103@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 08:08:49 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FYI... I'm planning to T&R apr-1.4.5, apr-util-1.3.12 "soon" From: Jeff Trawick To: APR Developer List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 2:53 PM, olli hauer wrote: > On 2011-05-18 20:20, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> It turns out that httpd 2.2.18 has a binary ABI breakage bug which >> will require a re-roll. =A0If we have our 1.4.4/1.3.11 regressions >> (Windows debug log, ldap pool cleanup, fnmatch edge case) resolved in >> new releases in time, that would be great for all. >> >> If you're aware of any regressions for which a fix hasn't been >> committed, please follow up on this thread. =A0Releases will need to >> happen pretty quickly to avoid slowing down httpd 2.2.19 too much. >> > > Hi Jeff, > > I'm just preparing a test build against apache-2.2.18 with 1200+ ports. > I can report broken builds if they are apr-1.4.4/httpd-2.2.18 related. > It needs some hours until I have the results. But please don't request/ > expect a functionality ;) I don't think we'll wait more than 10 more hours on the T&R of apr-1.4.5, barring any further news of regression. If you have any results in the meantime, we'll be eager to hear.