From dev-return-24106-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org  Thu May 12 01:30:38 2011
Return-Path: <dev-return-24106-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFFE4456B
	for <apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org>; Thu, 12 May 2011 01:30:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 38701 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 01:30:38 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org
Received: (qmail 38639 invoked by uid 500); 12 May 2011 01:30:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:dev@apr.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@apr.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@apr.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.apr.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org
Received: (qmail 38631 invoked by uid 99); 12 May 2011 01:30:38 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 01:30:38 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [64.202.165.196] (HELO smtpout04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.196)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 12 May 2011 01:30:29 +0000
Received: (qmail 18881 invoked from network); 12 May 2011 01:30:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (76.252.112.72)
  by smtpout04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.196) with ESMTP; 12 May 2011 01:30:06 -0000
Message-ID: <4DCB381D.7060605@rowe-clan.net>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 20:30:05 -0500
From: "William A. Rowe Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@apr.apache.org
Subject: Re: LoadLibrary failures? (Was: RE: MinGW status)
References: <040c01cc0fe0$52c7ab90$f85702b0$@qqmail.nl>	<BANLkTim2F9R=rn1-7B9m+2SYAzWxMCSogA@mail.gmail.com>	<4DCAF51E.3040106@rowe-clan.net> <BANLkTi=GLeqdVesbJfFxjHqFaW8rr2x8Uw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTi=GLeqdVesbJfFxjHqFaW8rr2x8Uw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

On 5/11/2011 7:39 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 4:44 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/apr/apr/trunk/misc/win32/misc.c?r1=892177&r2=892176&pathrev=892177
> 
> BTW, who did that one :)

Bugger :)  Why, I have no idea, but it was spawned by someone elses
observations.  The questions about taking &(handle) sound very very
strange, as if something is misdeclared.  I'll research in a week or
few.