From dev-return-24114-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Sun May 15 14:33:50 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 559D84E31 for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 14:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34557 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2011 14:33:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 34499 invoked by uid 500); 15 May 2011 14:33:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 34491 invoked by uid 99); 15 May 2011 14:33:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 May 2011 14:33:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of minfrin@sharp.fm designates 72.32.122.20 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.32.122.20] (HELO chandler.sharp.fm) (72.32.122.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 15 May 2011 14:33:41 +0000 Received: from chandler.sharp.fm (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chandler.sharp.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D875C801E; Sun, 15 May 2011 09:33:20 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [10.0.0.251] (87-194-125-18.bethere.co.uk [87.194.125.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: minfrin@sharp.fm) by chandler.sharp.fm (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901285C8017; Sun, 15 May 2011 09:33:19 -0500 (CDT) Cc: APR Developer List Message-Id: <1025033B-43E0-40E6-B4E2-3CDF236A931A@sharp.fm> From: Graham Leggett To: William A. Rowe Jr. In-Reply-To: <4DA7A1A6.7010509@rowe-clan.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: planning to T&R apr-util 1.3.11 later today Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 16:33:18 +0200 References: <4DA726B3.4090407@rowe-clan.net> <2532D115-2BBE-4276-AEB7-DC339D9CF657@sharp.fm> <4DA7A1A6.7010509@rowe-clan.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 15 Apr 2011, at 3:38 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: > Guessing you are catching up on list traffic sequentially and you'll > note that > Jeff clarified this wasn't about apr-util 1.4 at all. Presuming we > want some > apr-util 1.4/1.5, I'll get the review done shortly against *trunk* > anticipating > that we will replace apr_crypto before any official apr project > release, if that > works for you? All the changes in your laundry list that hadn't already been done on trunk have now been applied to trunk, most specifically the reordering of the parameters and the removal of apr_crypto_t where apr_crypto_block_t was already present in the API call. Apart from whitespace and comments, your previously posted apr_crypto.h and apr v2.0's apr_crypto.h are now identical. Next step will be to backport the current apr v2.0 API to v1.4, so that there is just one common API in v2.0 and v1.4, which will in theory remove any blockers we currently have over releasing apr-util v1.4. Does this plan make sense? Regards, Graham --