apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: apr 1.4.3, apr-util 1.3.11
Date Mon, 04 Apr 2011 17:02:42 GMT
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 12:10 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
<wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> On 3/23/2011 7:02 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Bert Huijben <bert@qqmail.nl> wrote:
>>>> Repeating my requests from last year:
>>>> I would really like to see r960665 ported back and released in the next release
to fix this Apr issue, before Subversion 1.7.0 goes in public beta.
>>> Any concerns out there with this fix for Windows?  There's no CHANGES
>>> entry, so it may have been overlooked.
>> (wrowe discussed this previously, and may or may not get time to
>> resolve in the short term)
> I'll be able to propose the resolution by midday Thursday and make sure that
> Bert and I are satisfied with the solution from the svn perspective.
>>> A couple of other fixes in trunk CHANGES to consider backporting:
>>>  *) apr_dbd_oracle: fix endianness issue in prepared statements
>>>     PR 50690 [Stefan Ruppert <sr myarm.com>]
>>>  *) Fix address handling when accepting an AF_INET socket from a socket
>>>     bound as AF_INET6.   PR 49678.  [Joe Orton]
>> I forgot about these two, and will go look.
>> What else before 1.4.3/1.3.11?
>> * wrowe is working on another issue which (I guess) requires a couple more days
>> * I may find time to backport some revisions from trunk to get MinGW
>> in better shape if I'm "sure" it won't break anything else
>> ** several trunk revisions of .in/.m4 foo will get 1.4.x running the
>> test suite pretty well; call it "experimental" since the feature set
>> doesn't exactly match a normal Windows build, it only builds static
>> libs, etc.)
> The issues I'm working on should be wrapped up by Thursday evening.

have a new ETA?

View raw message