apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: MinGW status
Date Wed, 13 Apr 2011 17:53:29 GMT
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:55 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
> <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:

>> APR_HA... excellent!  If you can add these other symbols at your leisure,
>> it is good for documentation purposes, even if they have been mismatched
>> for a while.  This mingw/msys build should be good to keep them in sync
>> and observe any quirks/differences more regularly!  My old method was to
>> ./configure linux and then take a stab at figuring out which was which,
>> and resorting to try to get them aligned.  But dozens of configure.in and
>> build/*.m4 patches later, they are going to fall out of alignment again.
>
> I'll see what else I can tweak.

After the last commits the main HAVE/HAS differences between apr.hw
and my MinGW builds of trunk are

Only in apr.h:
APR_HAVE_DIRENT_H=1
APR_HAVE_INET_NETWORK=1
APR_HAVE_SEMAPHORE_H=1
APR_HAVE_STDINT_H=1
APR_HAVE_STRCASECMP=1
APR_HAVE_STRINGS_H=1
APR_HAVE_STRNCASECMP=1
APR_HAVE_SYS_TIME_H=1
APR_HAVE_UNISTD_H=1

Only in apr.hw:
APR_HAVE_DIRENT_H=0
APR_HAVE_INET_NETWORK=0
APR_HAVE_SEMAPHORE_H=0
APR_HAVE_STDINT_H=0
APR_HAVE_STRCASECMP=0
APR_HAVE_STRINGS_H=0
APR_HAVE_STRNCASECMP=0
APR_HAVE_SYS_TIME_H=0
APR_HAVE_UNISTD_H=0

(omitting build-time choices ICONV/IPV6)

No claim here that anything needs to be done about it...

Mime
View raw message