apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bert Huijben" <b...@qqmail.nl>
Subject RE: apr 1.4.3, apr-util 1.3.11
Date Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:11:55 GMT

> -----Original Message-----
> From: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net]
> Sent: maandag 14 maart 2011 17:14
> To: dev@apr.apache.org
> Subject: Re: apr 1.4.3, apr-util 1.3.11
> On 3/14/2011 8:02 AM, Bert Huijben wrote:
> >
> > I would really like to see r960665 ported back and released in the next
> release to fix this Apr issue, before Subversion 1.7.0 goes in public beta.
> Agreed in principal, which is why this is on my short list already
> when I replied to Jeff.  As you know, I believe this change is
> incorrect, you shouldn't be able to get canonical APR paths into
> this state, which is why I need to spend cycles [I hadn't had yet].
> Either way, I'll veto the change on trunk with the explanation or
> backport this patch, this week.
> Sorry to have left it hanging.

As long as it properly fixes the testcase added with this patch, I really don't mind a better

Normally you get in this state before starting the application that uses Apr; not from inside
the application (see the original thread from November 2009). So getting in the error state
is not an application error!
But reproducing it that way would require a more extensive test.


View raw message