apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Bert Huijben" <b...@qqmail.nl>
Subject RE: apr 1.4.3, apr-util 1.3.11
Date Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:02:47 GMT


> -----Original Message-----
> From: William A. Rowe Jr. [mailto:wrowe@rowe-clan.net]
> Sent: zaterdag 12 maart 2011 22:13
> To: APR Developer List
> Subject: Re: apr 1.4.3, apr-util 1.3.11
> 
> On 3/12/2011 7:31 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> > lots of fixes awaiting apr 1.4.3, a few fixes awaiting apr-util 1.3.11
> >
> > there's perhaps even some low hanging fruit in bugzilla, but I think
> > we're going to need to pull out the machete and do some general
> > cleaning so that the useful reports are more obvious
> >
> > I volunteer to T & R
> >
> > if you're working on fixes, please suggest a date by which you can
> > complete any work you want to do for the next release (no, this isn't
> > &dayjob; but it would be great to have a general idea)
> 
> Wouldn't it be better to do this on the dev@apr list?  Or at least hit
> all the affected projects e.g. svn, log4cpp etc :)
> 
> I have a very short list of things to work on for apr 1.4/util 1.3 branches
> that I think I expect I can wrap up this coming week, several of them being
> championed by subversion.  I'll push off all of the apr 1.5-2.0/util 1.4
> thoughts from discussion until the week after.

Repeating my requests from last year:

I would really like to see r960665 ported back and released in the next release to fix this
Apr issue, before Subversion 1.7.0 goes in public beta.

	Bert

PS: My apache username is rhuijben


Mime
View raw message