From dev-return-23656-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Fri Dec 17 14:23:16 2010
Return-Path: <dev-return-23656-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: (qmail 82469 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2010 14:23:16 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 17 Dec 2010 14:23:16 -0000
Received: (qmail 13041 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2010 14:23:16 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org
Received: (qmail 12706 invoked by uid 500); 17 Dec 2010 14:23:15 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:dev@apr.apache.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-help@apr.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@apr.apache.org>
List-Id: <dev.apr.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org
Received: (qmail 12698 invoked by uid 99); 17 Dec 2010 14:23:15 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:23:15 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 76.96.62.32 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of jim@jagunet.com)
Received: from [76.96.62.32] (HELO qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net) (76.96.62.32)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:23:05 +0000
Received: from omta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.43])
	by qmta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast
	id kDBP1f0050vyq2s53ENlWz; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:22:45 +0000
Received: from [192.168.199.10] ([69.251.84.64])
	by omta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast
	id kENi1f0091PGofZ3RENjDn; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:22:44 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] %lld support in apr_snprintf()
From: Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com>
In-Reply-To: <20C17D01-6528-4AE5-B7EF-9BC3BB7DB078@sharp.fm>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:22:40 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CEF1753C-4C47-49C3-9698-5FBEDC378459@jagunet.com>
References: <37818C6C-E90A-4DA4-A57B-91E8A4612077@temme.net> <4CD3066E.7010402@rowe-clan.net> <1D4C0A5A-5966-41A9-AB53-F3963CD59E80@temme.net> <AANLkTikZe33rW-_PP_be=mDW9JMtu+jtQe-KztwxDh0v@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTi=fwXYhBVE_gvwY2KiFT3xv36GG=_Vq_gmuW+=J@mail.gmail.com> <1DAE160F-A799-4E68-85F4-4AA7477EC3B8@nasa.gov> <AANLkTin7_-Fw2zv87LQdrVZZLkO_S7gXTOk-rX0rkexa@mail.gmail.com> <2AD67559-8ADA-4E9A-9DBF-3DF913C0D813@jaguNET.com> <yuahbeewutm.fsf@kabuki.mynet> <30554DCD-35E8-45E6-9A46-60E9C077A6DE@jaguNET.com> <1AEDF293-893D-4A61-9896-0FD06BA89C83@jaguNET.com> <1C04627C-2669-4257-90DC-157EAE192999@jaguNET.com> <yuaaak47grr.fsf@kabuki.mynet> <F2124C20-06C1-4C58-9117-E539E1040E48@jaguNET.com> <81AC4DE7-FA8C-460F-9179-389ACC55BE8F@jaguNET.com> <4877D0E1-C4A2-4CAE-9CC2-5C23E3145778@sharp.fm> <676672BC-7DC8-4812-95F1-76372137169C@jagunet.com> <20C17D01-6528-4AE5-B7EF-9BC3BB7DB078@sharp.fm>
To: APR Developer List <dev@apr.apache.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org


On Dec 17, 2010, at 9:12 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:

> On 17 Dec 2010, at 3:53 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>=20
>> iirc, the concept of using __LP64__ was nixed (iirc, about a year
>> ago I had a large patch set which used that). r824818 and r824762
>>=20
>> Not sure if that veto is still valid or not.
>=20
> As I recall, the veto attempted to veto the concept of an Apple =
"universal binary", something that we've supported without a problem =
since 2005. I don't think Apple is going to withdraw support for =
universal binaries on our say so, I recommend we look at it again.
>=20

I'd agree... ;)

I'll give it a few days and, unless I hear someone re-veto
I'll re-commit those patches...