apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jagunet.com>
Subject Re: [PATCH] Re: [PATCH] %lld support in apr_snprintf()
Date Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:53:26 GMT

On Dec 17, 2010, at 8:32 AM, Graham Leggett wrote:

> On 17 Dec 2010, at 2:33 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> 
>> Hold on, yeah, it does seem to still not like universal.
>> 
>> But at least this is better than it was...
> 
> A while back I asked Apple directly what their solution was, and they said they amend
the apr.h after the fact using this:
> 
> http://www.opensource.apple.com/source/apr/apr-23/apr/files/fix-apr.h.ed
> 
> While amending the apr.h file after the fact is obviously not the solution, picking apart
what they've done and building it into the apr.h.in should work.

iirc, the concept of using __LP64__ was nixed (iirc, about a year
ago I had a large patch set which used that). r824818 and r824762

Not sure if that veto is still valid or not.


Mime
View raw message