Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of covener@gmail.com designates
 209.85.216.178 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=H1NQvNrAxCWmG9aZZLOaWWeoVWzmYi5AUFzXNp4lm/BArK6wODk34d2UV17kiBAra/
         8AH43zw9ivk18yJ4dQypP4cSRDHFAuB+ui4ncwgkVtAqvPAYUH5YRWNUTL/wyEDyljba
         plsBfh9cN7CxuM9mHwKc0PKNh/R4Tc7AqFC6c=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinmaT44G1c8yKX4Y0UcwobPbR_W7ctxNjMjkjHG@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikLTopjUGJ+BZE8-Asa28kHap8etYTvYbCNOd4-@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTikbGr_tGxbfQvnvTGT6mkEEpx1jrvzZ-N1dEq9P@mail.gmail.com>
	<4CABA9F5.9070109@apache.org>
	<AANLkTinmaT44G1c8yKX4Y0UcwobPbR_W7ctxNjMjkjHG@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 18:15:12 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=eg3Hw=ZFavqwKPPyNC4Unov0yvhztXjroFgAU@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: apr 0.9.19/apr-util 0.9.18?
From: Eric Covener <covener@gmail.com>
To: APR Developer List <dev@apr.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Guenter Knauf <fuankg@apache.org> wrote:
>> Am 05.10.2010 22:58, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
>>>
>>> does anybody strongly believe that we should get expat fixed in 0.9.x
>>> (whether they have time or not)?
>>
>> /me asking dumb question:
>> is it much more work than just copying over from 1.3 ?
>
> doesn't seem like it
>
> attached is a diff between apr-util/0.9.x/xml and apr-util-1.3.9/xml,
> minus config.{sub,guess} and generated files
>
> not much build stuff to think about

On my way out the door, but was the build stuff to upgrade expat in
1.3.x significantly less than trunk?  I might have been spooked by
that unnecessarily.

-- 
Eric Covener
covener@gmail.com