Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4314 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 01:49:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 6 Oct 2010 01:49:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 32331 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 01:49:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 32249 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2010 01:49:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 32242 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2010 01:49:46 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 01:49:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.183] (HELO smtpauth03.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.183) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 06 Oct 2010 01:49:39 +0000 Received: (qmail 8219 invoked from network); 6 Oct 2010 01:49:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (76.252.112.72) by smtpauth03.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.183) with ESMTP; 06 Oct 2010 01:49:17 -0000 Message-ID: <4CABD599.4080900@rowe-clan.net> Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 20:49:13 -0500 From: "William A. Rowe Jr." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: why do we need this pain? References: <4CABAAD7.40405@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <4CABAAD7.40405@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/5/2010 5:46 PM, Guenter Knauf wrote: > Hi all, > with almost all other lists we have set the reply-to address to the list, so if you just > hit reply then post goes to list as it should be - why the heck is that not true for the > dev@apr list?? > sure, I only need to take care of it, and hit 'reply to list', but too often I forget > about - and as shown in the past it happens to a lot of others too every now and then ... > is there any reason why we cant have this equal with all ASF lists? Yes, because the "don't make assumptions" gospel ("reply-to-all considered harmful") never made it to older projects, httpd, tomcat, xml and the like. That said, I'm +/-0 on changing this. I have to deal with both, daily. return EDONTCARE;