apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Vote] apr-util 1.5.x -> trunk
Date Thu, 07 Oct 2010 10:22:57 GMT
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:26 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> On 10/5/2010 2:40 AM, Joe Orton wrote:
>> Any objection to renaming the apr-util 1.5.x branch to "trunk"?  It is
>> the trunk for that tree now.
> Counting up the opinions posted on the list...
>  [ ] Rename 1.5.x to "trunk"
>     jorton, rjung, minfrin, trawick, jim
>  [ ] apr/ is 'apr-util/ trunk', stub apr-util/trunk with guidance
>     wrowe, niq, henryjen, poirier

These choices seem skewed to me.  "apr is apr-util/trunk" is a
different concept than "rename 1.5.x to trunk."  Conceptually, "apr is
apr-util trunk" whatever we decide.

The question is whether the latest apr-1.x-compatible apr-util is
apr-util trunk or apr-util 1.5.x (today; could be apr-util 1.6.x next

It's no huge deal to me, but I vote for "the latest apr-1.x-compatible
apr-util is apr-util trunk."

View raw message