apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: apr 0.9.19/apr-util 0.9.18?
Date Thu, 07 Oct 2010 23:13:34 GMT
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Eric Covener <covener@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Guenter Knauf <fuankg@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Am 05.10.2010 22:58, schrieb Jeff Trawick:
>>>>
>>>> does anybody strongly believe that we should get expat fixed in 0.9.x
>>>> (whether they have time or not)?
>>>
>>> /me asking dumb question:
>>> is it much more work than just copying over from 1.3 ?
>>
>> doesn't seem like it
>>
>> attached is a diff between apr-util/0.9.x/xml and apr-util-1.3.9/xml,
>> minus config.{sub,guess} and generated files
>>
>> not much build stuff to think about
>
> On my way out the door, but was the build stuff to upgrade expat in
> 1.3.x significantly less than trunk?  I might have been spooked by
> that unnecessarily.

Perhaps this is related

$ svn diff http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr-util/vendor/expat/1.95.7
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/apr/apr-util/branches/1.3.x/xml/expat

(attached)

(generated files, config.{sub,guess}, some other trivialities removed)

Mime
View raw message