apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Graham Leggett <minf...@sharp.fm>
Subject Re: apr-util 1.5.x -> trunk
Date Wed, 06 Oct 2010 18:24:00 GMT
On 06 Oct 2010, at 6:20 PM, Joe Orton wrote:

> I don't really need the status quo "explained" to me in a README file.
> I proposed to fix it, because it is (to me, obviously) broken.
> 1) The tip of development for the apr-util tree is what is currently
> branches/1.5.x.  Yes, most of that code also exists in the apr tree.
> apr-util releases and branches do not come from the apr tree, they  
> come
> from the apr-util tree.
> 2) I have hard-coded into my brain the convention that the trunk is  
> the
> trunk, not a branch named by its current version.  I also have scripts
> which make this assumption.
> 3) The trunk called branches/1.5.x will have to be renamed to a trunk
> called branches/1.6.x if 1.5.x gets cut.  Which is dumb.
> 4) Yes, "people" might get confused if they try to use apr-util's  
> trunk
> with the APR 2.x, but, meh.  We are the people who use the VCS and it
> should be arranged for our convenience.



View raw message