If it were up to me, I'd favor giving commit on the basis of merit and demonstrated involvement, just like anyone else.
On Apr 8, 2010, at 5:15 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
> On 4/7/2010 8:56 PM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
>> On Thu, 2010-04-08 at 00:37 +0100, Nick Kew wrote:
>>> Who do you have in mind, or are you suggesting a blanket commit?
>> For instance, Hyrum K. Wright submitted a patch for apr_hash and asked
>> about it a few times. My understanding is that he's a Subversion
>> committer. Instead of him waiting for some of us to do it, we can just
>> make him a committer here. When other Subversion folks submit patches,
>> we can then do the same. It would help APR move along quicker, I
> We can, and actually Hyrum would be a fine choice. But as an en masse
> thing? Even Subversion graduates their committers into different levels
> of trust, just as httpd does. I think we can ask for and expect some
> quality patches before adding them to the apr ldap commit group.