Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 24418 invoked from network); 11 Feb 2010 12:03:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Feb 2010 12:03:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 72403 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2010 12:03:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 72307 invoked by uid 500); 11 Feb 2010 12:03:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 72299 invoked by uid 99); 11 Feb 2010 12:03:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:03:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of trawick@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.218 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.218] (HELO mail-gx0-f218.google.com) (209.85.217.218) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 12:03:33 +0000 Received: by mail-gx0-f218.google.com with SMTP id 10so1070126gxk.3 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 04:02:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=vodLbSBhxAzTlTb3q8oj3OWKGc6EBi6TWQ8ipmJ3no8=; b=Cbx6ZR0ar9mFtg6KQgPgnjHGdd9Q4L9uG29koWXv7egOyZCe9ibj4AOXcn231AI4tj 6RgbCCHtFxaNItSR5QkFLtEUYKvkBSq2GL0K5fsdf4oMfHrivd5HSjFcc3S2s2xgwTOt f+y697sGBnv0pNHFHNDgQ+Idyyp/SIpmPL2U8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=W1xFXOXiJgxMzBZrKS36Y88Wy7V5vm/bhrYTW0SUNctt5z/MishAYYGpAB1tbofI2Q q3G/tcguI6sr5TjhL2bUn0zb83A1Jf77TlbQ8l2HcnPS2RjPccdz7RnorbWRXDsQxSkV X78NpdKRLsFAQOIYtRZ7FFjbCpsgLsF+Sbkqs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.168.27 with SMTP id v27mr2318213ano.45.1265889527203; Thu, 11 Feb 2010 03:58:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <004F7567115041469C1C0F8927A41818@gpspc> References: <20100210094639.GA3685@redhat.com> <7124d6e51002101437v21c50e03n4b88632ed8786a02@mail.gmail.com> <004F7567115041469C1C0F8927A41818@gpspc> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 06:58:47 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] release apr-1.3.12 From: Jeff Trawick To: dev@apr.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Gregory Szorc wr= ote: >> Sure; it might be quicker to use LD_LIBRARY_PATH to run the 1.3.12 >> testall testpoll against apr 1.3.9's libapr before sorting through >> individual commits. > > The instant I read this, I realized my shell likely had LD_LIBRARY_PATH s= et. > Sure enough, it was. =A0And, it was pointing to a path that had a 1.3.8 A= PR > shared library. =A0After unsetting LD_LIBRARY_PATH, `testall` found the p= roper > 1.3.12 library and passed the aforementioned poll tests. > > I suppose testall could be compiled to reference libapr-1.so.x.y.z instea= d > of libapr-1.so to minimize the possibility of this. =A0But, a bad environ= ment > is a bad environment. > > Sorry for the fire drill. =A0I'll try not to be so careless next time. OTOH, apr releases tend to be a bit boring.