Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 32880 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2010 22:38:08 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Feb 2010 22:38:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 43059 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2010 22:38:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 42953 invoked by uid 500); 10 Feb 2010 22:38:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 42945 invoked by uid 99); 10 Feb 2010 22:38:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:38:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of gregory.szorc@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.50] (HELO mail-vw0-f50.google.com) (209.85.212.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:37:59 +0000 Received: by vws2 with SMTP id 2so197113vws.37 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:37:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=PRMv85nySJ0ztwY1ESeYQlf87BS+y5tB7pTaiEuheGU=; b=YBqilDM2rAPZ/gGZANuz6H6DK1nZGFfmvj9GJtWd2+N4bs695orK+YSAoB/bjy9RcM GFL3lnutpQpXGuAsjPQ38szsmKccVbGvS+q4QCbYRy1zUwcesyQ1nBiwAsiF2pbs5x4s WyDsCSHBwl32e7yTn909cL0J87GZAIClkGTRI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=wJpW0qvsm+rX1MaE6qo7tT7ntF6cxbpb3kDG3RXfE2moe75xSJor55vGz1E62A/m5x /BEEVari3Rq9n5VWE7pgYm29WEWnJQfya93q0XKusFR8Vav7elEujgz3TKrPEohjwxCE UiJC3IB+TPk4uYCUsP6DPcig/uzWjTEvLV67Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.123.25 with SMTP id n25mr631443vcr.80.1265841458524; Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:37:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20100210094639.GA3685@redhat.com> References: <20100210094639.GA3685@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:37:38 -0800 Message-ID: <7124d6e51002101437v21c50e03n4b88632ed8786a02@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] release apr-1.3.12 From: Gregory Szorc To: dev@apr.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e68db9207a3304047f46ae69 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016e68db9207a3304047f46ae69 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I'm not sure if this is the best place to post this, but when running `make check` against the 1.3.12 dist on Solaris x86, the test hangs in testpoll. Attaching a debugger reveals the following backtrace: #0 0xfedc9a45 in _portfs () from /lib/libc.so.1 #1 0xfed55c29 in port_getn () from /lib/libc.so.1 #2 0xfef898a6 in apr_pollcb_poll (pollcb=0x8163238, timeout=-4160455976, func=0x806626d , baton=0x8047b04) at poll/unix/port.c:490 #3 0x08066408 in trigger_pollcb (tc=0x8047b3c, data=0x0) at testpoll.c:617 #4 0x080557c1 in abts_run_test (ts=0x80f5b20, f=0x80662f1 , value=0x0) at abts.c:168 #5 0x08066904 in testpoll (suite=0x80f5b20) at testpoll.c:702 #6 0x08056171 in main (argc=2, argv=0x8047bc4) at abts.c:424 uname is "SunOS 5.10 Generic_142901-03 i86pc i386 i86pc." /etc/release reports as "Solaris 10 10/09 s10x_u8wos_08a X86." If someone can point me to the appropriate bug, I'll post whatever information I can. Greg On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 08:47:32PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > See http://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ for the candidate distribution > > files (no Windows source yet -- Bill, is it correct that the one > > generated by release.sh is not used?). > > > > The primary changes since apr-1.3.9 are several fixes for the Solaris > platform. > > > > +/-1 > > [+1] Release apr-1.3.12 > > Looks good here - builds and passes tests on Fedora 12/x86_64. > > - Diff vs 1.3.9 looks fine > - CHANGES looks fine > - Signatures fine > > Thanks for RMing! > > Regards, Joe > --0016e68db9207a3304047f46ae69 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm not sure if this is the best place to post this, but when running `= make check` against the 1.3.12 dist on Solaris x86, the test hangs in testp= oll.=A0 Attaching a debugger reveals the following backtrace:

#0=A0 = 0xfedc9a45 in _portfs () from /lib/libc.so.1
#1=A0 0xfed55c29 in port_getn () from /lib/libc.so.1
#2=A0 0xfef898a6 in= apr_pollcb_poll (pollcb=3D0x8163238, timeout=3D-4160455976, func=3D0x80662= 6d <trigger_pollcb_cb>,
=A0=A0=A0 baton=3D0x8047b04) at poll/unix/= port.c:490
#3=A0 0x08066408 in trigger_pollcb (tc=3D0x8047b3c, data=3D0x0) at testpoll= .c:617
#4=A0 0x080557c1 in abts_run_test (ts=3D0x80f5b20, f=3D0x80662f1 = <trigger_pollcb>, value=3D0x0) at abts.c:168
#5=A0 0x08066904 in t= estpoll (suite=3D0x80f5b20) at testpoll.c:702
#6=A0 0x08056171 in main (argc=3D2, argv=3D0x8047bc4) at abts.c:424

= uname is "SunOS 5.10 Generic_142901-03 i86pc i386 i86pc." /etc/re= lease reports as "Solaris 10 10/09 s10x_u8wos_08a X86."

If= someone can point me to the appropriate bug, I'll post whatever inform= ation I can.

Greg

On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 1:46 AM,= Joe Orton <jorto= n@redhat.com> wrote:
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 08:47:32PM -0500,= Jeff Trawick wrote:
> See http= ://apr.apache.org/dev/dist/ for the candidate distribution
> files (no Windows source yet -- Bill, is it correct that the one
> generated by release.sh is not used?).
>
> The primary changes since apr-1.3.9 are several fixes for the Solaris = platform.
>
> +/-1
> =A0[+1] Release apr-1.3.12

Looks good here - builds and passes tests on Fedora 12/x86_64.

- Diff vs 1.3.9 looks fine
- CHANGES looks fine
- Signatures fine

Thanks for RMing!

Regards, Joe

--0016e68db9207a3304047f46ae69--