apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: uh, let's finally release 1.4.2 and 1.3.12
Date Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:09:18 GMT
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 11:38 AM, William A. Rowe Jr.
<wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> On 2/19/2010 5:48 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Trawick <trawick@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> nice-to-haves:
>>>  Win32 source flavor of release tarballs, for both 1.4.2 and 1.3.12
>>
>> I guess I'm waiting for Bill to say "go ahead without them" or "I'm
>> trying to get caught up".
>
> All of the above(!)
>
>>> see site updates in attachment (generated html not included)
>>>
>>> basic theme is that 1.4.2-is-the-best-apr but acknowledge 1.3.12 as a
>>> bug fix release for the 1.3 series
>>>
>>> AFAICT apr 1.3.9/apr-util-1.3.9 were the last releases with security fixes
>>
>> Can anyone ACK the following?
>
>> Update the 1.4 announcement to indicate that 1.3.12 is being released
>> at the same time.
>> Remove the 1.3 announcement.
>> (Eventually) Send the 1.4 announcement to dev@apr.apache.org &
>> announce@apache.org.
>
> Suggestion that I started locally in-tree when you first pointed this out;
>
> We rename the file to APR-Announce-1.x.txt - within, it heralds 1.4.2 has
> been released with a corresponding 1.3.9 security release.  But with the
> rename, it makes perfect sense for apr-util to be 1.3 while apr is at 1.4 :)

That's a good solution.

I can work that path if you didn't get far, or simply step aside, or XXX.

Mime
View raw message