apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Trawick <traw...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] release apr-1.3.12
Date Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:58:47 GMT
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sure; it might be quicker to use LD_LIBRARY_PATH to run the 1.3.12
>> testall testpoll against apr 1.3.9's libapr before sorting through
>> individual commits.
>
> The instant I read this, I realized my shell likely had LD_LIBRARY_PATH set.
> Sure enough, it was.  And, it was pointing to a path that had a 1.3.8 APR
> shared library.  After unsetting LD_LIBRARY_PATH, `testall` found the proper
> 1.3.12 library and passed the aforementioned poll tests.
>
> I suppose testall could be compiled to reference libapr-1.so.x.y.z instead
> of libapr-1.so to minimize the possibility of this.  But, a bad environment
> is a bad environment.
>
> Sorry for the fire drill.  I'll try not to be so careless next time.

OTOH, apr releases tend to be a bit boring.

Mime
View raw message