apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: svn commit: r906987 - /apr/apr/branches/1.3.x/build/buildcheck.sh
Date Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:37:12 GMT
On 2/5/2010 10:25 AM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>> I noticed this when reviewing the 1.3.10 tarballs (still on my
>> machine).  Should I retag 1.3.10 to avoid potential user confusion?
> 
> or just skip 1.3.10 and call it 1.3.11; I don't care either way
> 
> (If I hadn't sat back so long watching Bill crank these suckers out
> I'd be done.  Thanks, Bill!)

A PITA, huh?  :)  I would suggest simply rerolling with this change;
"No C sources were harmed in the creation of this tarball".

But that's just my 2c, others might disagree.



Mime
View raw message