apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: apr-util - "missing" file is GPL licensed
Date Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:50:40 GMT
On 2/4/2010 5:58 PM, Nick Kew wrote:
> On 4 Feb 2010, at 21:03, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> ]] Nick Kew 
>> | I don't know if it comes under any of the FSF's exceptions for the
>> | core toolchain (as in, compiling with gcc and linking glibc doesn't
>> | bring you under GPL).
>> It's a shell script.  It's hardly linked into expat or apr-util and
>> there's no way it can make the generated binaries fall under the GPL.
> Yes, I know it's a shell script.
> The point is, we *are* distributing it!

>From what I can see; needlessly so.  It's configuration is out-of-sorts
with the modern autoconf and libtool packages, and since this is for apr,
we should be able to scope out libtool entirely (apr provides that magic).
Which leaves a bunch of autoconf work to be done to bring it up to modern
standards, but would eliminate this artifact in the very next releases.

Working on it, in the meantime I still don't believe there is cause to
actually panic :)

View raw message