Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 49080 invoked from network); 15 Dec 2009 18:19:02 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Dec 2009 18:19:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 37856 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2009 18:19:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 37725 invoked by uid 500); 15 Dec 2009 18:19:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 37717 invoked by uid 99); 15 Dec 2009 18:19:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:19:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.227] (HELO mail-fx0-f227.google.com) (209.85.220.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:18:58 +0000 Received: by fxm27 with SMTP id 27so161726fxm.3 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:18:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.3.197 with SMTP id 5mr1569320fao.75.1260901115107; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:18:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?172.31.13.157? (cpe-90-157-168-220.dynamic.amis.net [90.157.168.220]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm137379fks.7.2009.12.15.10.18.33 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:18:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B27D2F8.2080601@xbc.nu> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:18:32 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] APR versioning rules w.r.t. released snapshots References: <20091215150529.GA22442@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20091215150529.GA22442@redhat.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAAXNSR0IArs4c6QAAADBQTFRF IhsbCy0qZjoVOVRoeFxSAIKBzXQiAKaibYiewnk7nn9z0qCTgL3i87Ep6Kx/+tHBsrE+zgAAAjZJ REFUOMvF0jFoE1EYB/CzjWlqIzaTjqVIBifRRWyG0t5iUqlLyFpCeXBgKg5yq6A4degUDJjoUDpc 1Qt4Ux94B11SOLB0KGS4discpbkORTCn9/m9d3fvLhXnvuHu3f+Xx/veyyfZfLSdZHzgicSfeyw4 JISwdz8FT6M8lM8Ceg385Dlhs+cC9sQCDn0B78QCogzwN+sxfHGOIXBbRGkNAM4cZymGtgNsDPgz cByxon3EEm1TLmvAlghoHOO3CZSa+IQ/vF6JV8tgKOMow78gRgL2/+EIvATOUtB3SSdMg4GXgrbn uk0uLiGdoCHKbX4E+t1FUTqn1AtIdPJebssDQ64YANSQyyaQNyUOFs0ijMsMFnOPTahPLXKYowtY 08MfCP7vR7hRnc5zmPK7CDYYbHcbC7tHuyFA94U/1LYZaJpu/sxACHMwvwZljTLY0TbNk4x+zuEt yC3MfCM6uSIvfwur0itFL4FA2Yal8BzLfnYV4EIGwEPAk7o5zIcnvzHMEjwJrrhAKK7on6IrsfRJ 7A53BhaK+CL7fj6+q/sPeOvcDTtoZTxpUYsFeIknrOXep3p3l7Ua+8sZ5FPQKyKwWi+DfROTU7ny C1/9UhpeY7K287WJCzbsNPQm2S6Yk4PSCNhWM2r3nD0K9liYb6yPgCRJhSzPrxUK0yUBVk1VX0lj s7MzGZyp0wImMK/e8rHbz2soL+O+2r1dxfGsAmBcx0lNjS/RUhlUC7gRn1wGMdQ7Vw1/AReW/RN3 xFWdAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Joe Orton wrote: > Snapshots of the APR and APR-util 1.4.x trees have been distributed by > as part of the httpd 2.3.4 alpha release. Should the APR project treat > those snapshots as "releases" for versioning purposes? In other words, > should we ensure future APR/APR-util releases maintain source and binary > backwards compatibility with those snapshots as required by the > versioning guidelines, http://apr.apache.org/versioning.html? > > Please vote: > > [ ] Yes > [ ] No > By the way, if the answer turns out to be "no", then we can do the cryptoapi changes that were discussed in another thread for 1.4; and I was made aware of a patch to make pools friendlier to long-lived multithreaded applications which would be a nice-to-have (conceptually) in the 1.x series. -- Brane