Branko Čibej wrote:
>
> "Violation of the Apache APR trademark"? For distributing modified APR
> code? Are you serious? You are, among other things, explicitly
> forbidding drop-in re-implementations which our license pretty much
> expressly allows. -1, and if this is a snipe at that recent httpd-alpha
> release, which "in light of current events" it appears to be, -2.
How so? Our license policy doesn't allow people to recycle our trademarks.
And it says nothing about re-implementations at all, AIUI.
They can do just about *anything* with the code by design, but not with the
Apache APR name itself. The same will be true for Apache Subversion.
Replacements can *never* use an Apache project name without explicit
permission. Only Apache Software Foundation code can be called "Apache Foo".
|