apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>
Subject Re: [VOTE] APR versioning rules w.r.t. released snapshots
Date Tue, 15 Dec 2009 18:27:51 GMT
Branko ─îibej wrote:
> By the way, if the answer turns out to be "no", then we can do the
> cryptoapi changes that were discussed in another thread for 1.4; and I
> was made aware of a patch to make pools friendlier to long-lived
> multithreaded applications which would be a nice-to-have (conceptually)
> in the 1.x series.

One makes sense, but the second doesn't.  If we are adding functions, great,
but I didn't think that was the scope.

The conceptual change I'd like to work towards for 1.5.0 is an extention
of the max free pool setting.  Take this one step further to track max
fragmentation of a specific pool before the pool is reaped and reallocated
as a single contiguous block.

View raw message