From dev-return-22557-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Fri Nov 13 18:24:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87918 invoked from network); 13 Nov 2009 18:24:14 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Nov 2009 18:24:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 26594 invoked by uid 500); 13 Nov 2009 18:24:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 26498 invoked by uid 500); 13 Nov 2009 18:24:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 26490 invoked by uid 99); 13 Nov 2009 18:24:13 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:24:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of gstein@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.213 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.213] (HELO mail-bw0-f213.google.com) (209.85.218.213) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:24:11 +0000 Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so3896869bwz.3 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:23:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XM12KQibcvpIgia7V+SReMq9qDaGwkc+MFCF0lmG4R0=; b=DbGAVilx8fuQmb2JjzhNPzyOyW06hYstWYmByZCIp1ErJyu5GirdPOZmaTX/owwWSy 3j+xfS0ZR9+KVNJ0hAUxRzMQaXlrfTamiSu4WYptqw/mdkvlWXYHmvpPmggyrXIRrHHm E2ya91IRJPg9cir0bKDKYfV9jaAUDqoV+qA/Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DNKXnEpq+5B+E6ZXXTSwPO2t5xoQF3I57ZdHT5nqBlnnS0co8wNZp7LLAZ0sWxs10Y +0r7Q24CmNxRSnPeth1Njy0ZU8Xwl+1X3ZtWydBG+g3AOjPqXgKoAW/kJytxhd5cx9mx OIeUTzPewp5/OMTiH8sIf80G97A3DhuSm6mfU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.13.210 with SMTP id d18mr622706bka.211.1258136629821; Fri, 13 Nov 2009 10:23:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4AFCEBA9.4070708@rowe-clan.net> References: <4AFB4B0D.2080800@rowe-clan.net> <4AFC61BE.50600@rowe-clan.net> <6cca3db30911121259n1e3d703ag345aafbcf9092d5f@mail.gmail.com> <200911130551.58609.Arfrever.FTA@gmail.com> <6cca3db30911122100he6cd7a9ub0c23a1ee4aa1e85@mail.gmail.com> <4AFCEBA9.4070708@rowe-clan.net> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:23:49 -0500 Message-ID: <6cca3db30911131023t132fb877mc3cbcab449ed1785@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: Future tag plans From: Greg Stein To: "William A. Rowe Jr." Cc: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis , dev@apr.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 00:16, William A. Rowe Jr. wr= ote: > Greg Stein wrote: >> >> The SVN API uses apr_pool_t. That typedef could disappear in APR 2.x, >> breaking our 1.x APIs. >> >> Thus, we cannot and will not support APR 2.x in the SVN 1.x series. > > could -> cannot/will not ? =A0what a leap. > > Gheesh, seriously, sounds like your polite point of [oh, and 0.9 but we > don't talk about that :-] > > Maybe apr_pool_t goes poof, most likely it doesn't, and either way it's > entirely possible to do this. =A0You are simply being woodenheaded :) My point was that *anything* could change and create a source/binary compatibility problem. And in all likelihood, something *will* change that we rely upon. One more argument to one function would bring down the house. That is all it takes. There isn't wiggle room here. Cheers, -g