apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Future tag plans
Date Fri, 13 Nov 2009 18:23:49 GMT
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 00:16, William A. Rowe Jr. <wrowe@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote:
>> The SVN API uses apr_pool_t. That typedef could disappear in APR 2.x,
>> breaking our 1.x APIs.
>> Thus, we cannot and will not support APR 2.x in the SVN 1.x series.
> could -> cannot/will not ?  what a leap.
> Gheesh, seriously, sounds like your polite point of [oh, and 0.9 but we
> don't talk about that :-]
> Maybe apr_pool_t goes poof, most likely it doesn't, and either way it's
> entirely possible to do this.  You are simply being woodenheaded :)

My point was that *anything* could change and create a source/binary
compatibility problem. And in all likelihood, something *will* change
that we rely upon. One more argument to one function would bring down
the house. That is all it takes.

There isn't wiggle room here.


View raw message