apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jim Jagielski <...@jaguNET.com>
Subject Re: Future tag plans
Date Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:02:52 GMT

On Nov 12, 2009, at 12:05 PM, Paul Querna wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 6:08 AM, Jim Jagielski <jim@jagunet.com> wrote:
>> Tag as what? Alpha? Beta? GA?? :)
> 
> APR doesn't have those versioning concepts AFAIK.

*grin*

That was the point, I think. I don't anyone thinks that either
are quite GA level yet, which implies some other tagging
convention.

> 
> If we released a 2.0.0, we couldn't break anything until 3.x.
> 
>> On Nov 11, 2009, at 6:38 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
>> 
>>> If nobody objects, I'll plan to tag 1.4.0 this coming Monday 11/16
>>> (it so happens to be after all my deadlines and right before more
>>> work obligations, so there a hole right there to fill).  Should give
>>> anyone sufficient time to wrap up their inspection of the API and
>>> code changes.
>>> 
>>> If nobody objects, I'll plan to tag 2.0.0 on 12/21 (during the start
>>> of my holidays) - which adds 4+ weeks beyond the close of a 1.4.0
>>> vote during which time folks are free to fix broken API declarations,
>>> drop deprecated interfaces, rename wonky function names and generally
>>> just make-ready for a GA.
>>> 
>>> So if there are objections, please quick raise/fix these so we can be
>>> moving on at svn, httpd and elsewhere :)
>>> 
>>> Bill
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 


Mime
View raw message