On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Graham Leggett <minfrin@sharp.fm> wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:

> too trivial for CHANGES...  waste of time for people looking there for
> interesting changes...

It was contributed by someone external to apr, and having banged my head
against the same shortcomings in documentation, such contributions are
very valuable and should be properly credited.

I don't mind the general idea of giving a little boost to the perceived importance of an outside contribution in order to justify listing it in CHANGES.  However, at the current rate I suspect that CHANGES will be half drivel before long.