On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:20 PM, Graham Leggett <email@example.com> wrote:
Jeff Trawick wrote:It was contributed by someone external to apr, and having banged my head
> too trivial for CHANGES... waste of time for people looking there for
> interesting changes...
against the same shortcomings in documentation, such contributions are
very valuable and should be properly credited.
I don't mind the general idea of giving a little boost to the perceived importance of an outside contribution in order to justify listing it in CHANGES. However, at the current rate I suspect that CHANGES will be half drivel before long.