From dev-return-22249-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Tue Sep 15 20:29:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 48337 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2009 20:29:11 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Sep 2009 20:29:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 18826 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2009 20:29:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 18737 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2009 20:29:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 18729 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2009 20:29:10 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:29:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.47] (HELO smtpauth23.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 20:29:00 +0000 Received: (qmail 22592 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2009 20:28:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (76.252.112.72) by smtpauth23.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.47) with ESMTP; 15 Sep 2009 20:28:38 -0000 Message-ID: <4AAFF8C2.5010004@rowe-clan.net> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:27:46 -0500 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Neil Conway CC: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: branches/1.3.x: broken build (apr_md5.h) References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Neil Conway wrote: > I get the following when I try to build branches/1.3.x (r815439) on OSX 10.6: > > /bin/sh /Users/neilconway/apr-1.3-stable/libtool --silent > --mode=compile gcc -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DDARWIN > -DSIGPROCMASK_SETS_THREAD_MASK -no-cpp-precomp -I./include > -I/Users/neilconway/apr-1.3-stable/include/arch/unix > -I./include/arch/unix > -I/Users/neilconway/apr-1.3-stable/include/arch/unix > -I/Users/neilconway/apr-1.3-stable/include -o > locks/unix/proc_mutex.lo -c locks/unix/proc_mutex.c && touch > locks/unix/proc_mutex.lo > locks/unix/proc_mutex.c:21:41: error: apr_md5.h: No such file or directory > locks/unix/proc_mutex.c: In function 'proc_mutex_posix_create': > locks/unix/proc_mutex.c:61: error: 'APR_MD5_DIGESTSIZE' undeclared > (first use in this function) > locks/unix/proc_mutex.c:61: error: (Each undeclared identifier is > reported only once > locks/unix/proc_mutex.c:61: error: for each function it appears in.) > make[1]: *** [locks/unix/proc_mutex.lo] Error 1 > > The culprit seems like r813589: > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/apr/apr/branches/1.3.x/locks/unix/proc_mutex.c?r1=813589&r2=813588&pathrev=813589 > > Presumably a build dependency on apr_md5.h makes more sense in trunk, > since apr and apr-util have been unified. Presumably it isn't > intentional to have apr-util be a build dependency of apr for the > 1.3.x branch, right? Certainly not :)