Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10758 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2009 20:48:44 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Aug 2009 20:48:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 83553 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2009 20:48:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 83447 invoked by uid 500); 13 Aug 2009 20:48:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 83439 invoked by uid 99); 13 Aug 2009 20:48:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:48:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [64.202.165.95] (HELO smtpauth04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net) (64.202.165.95) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 20:48:40 +0000 Received: (qmail 27959 invoked from network); 13 Aug 2009 20:48:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (97.83.110.121) by smtpauth04.prod.mesa1.secureserver.net (64.202.165.95) with ESMTP; 13 Aug 2009 20:48:16 -0000 Message-ID: <4A847C0D.1040305@rowe-clan.net> Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:48:13 -0400 From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Dailey CC: apr Subject: Re: Problem building using nmake on Windows References: <496954360906221957w2c4b2e15t254c45aa4ad57e55@mail.gmail.com> <4A5D30E8.4030306@rowe-clan.net> <496954360907142128v33be6bfer56bcff5b98e5587b@mail.gmail.com> <496954360907171701l5a70a6d1of3b64e8a453ea999@mail.gmail.com> <4A617866.2080403@rowe-clan.net> <496954360907210809y323b8a7fvc82cf0bedafdcfd2@mail.gmail.com> <4A65F08C.4070704@rowe-clan.net> <496954360907211026i3e212841ya0fb6d5524d5ccd3@mail.gmail.com> <496954360908081132w696e6a2la847d19a6c48047c@mail.gmail.com> <4A803717.8020902@rowe-clan.net> <496954360908131339m37448a8bq70dde1d85dd2e025@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <496954360908131339m37448a8bq70dde1d85dd2e025@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Robert Dailey wrote: > > Yes, it works as expected if I keep the directories as siblings as you > mentioned. I have one unrelated question, though. I mentioned this > earlier too. > > The NEON library (I think that's the one) expects the apr libraries to > be in a "Release" directory (e.g. apr\Release\apr-1.lib). So my question > is: Which library is broken? Is NEON wrong to assume the libraries will > be located in such a directory, or is APR wrong for putting the final > libraries in a LibR directory instead of a Release directory? NEON has the issue; an installed tree has bin/, lib/, include/ etc. They will break if you build for NT only, for example. > Thanks for your time. No bother, thanks for the research!