From dev-return-22187-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Fri Aug 14 22:03:26 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 77049 invoked from network); 14 Aug 2009 22:03:26 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 14 Aug 2009 22:03:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 16627 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2009 22:03:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 16509 invoked by uid 500); 14 Aug 2009 22:03:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 16500 invoked by uid 99); 14 Aug 2009 22:03:32 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:03:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of brian.havard@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.206 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.206] (HELO mail-ew0-f206.google.com) (209.85.219.206) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:03:20 +0000 Received: by ewy2 with SMTP id 2so1079391ewy.43 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:02:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5J6G1aNxib5uuK7mIsJ1cM1VIpELF3Tu0NY0iPh98p8=; b=IXd0mGM7SYymBTAQGUR+07YlNdaubhhnyJybKlOjnFyn4nvgKNfeqrajEYkjHL8gMt xvodVlsUaiRRzafQD08ve4iAhISDtS6mU0EsitcHbGfCQWOH0UT25xpWoc3yPojdd3Bb yPKhQn9DCibj0PWTpj+OEMHBEZCA4chrAlMlM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=onk91akhgegWzTaiPPpIlLF0dXPNlfDrd0tI6LMf3O2f2cPaWjWmpf7I1drZRlC0QZ 6yO3eScHhdwa2GejOf0JmgXzC1LkLbSEto5PBkOedAuscfCtaXZ6KwkhU26cy8W5gpuc xXs2+0xY8SxxWGlwxw9weQVLfg7QfDEOOW4n8= Received: by 10.210.89.7 with SMTP id m7mr99767ebb.14.1250287378841; Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:02:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.1? (93-97-192-116.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.192.116]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm3459078eyb.50.2009.08.14.15.02.58 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 14 Aug 2009 15:02:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A85DF10.9000704@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 23:02:56 +0100 From: Brian Havard User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090608) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@apr.apache.org Subject: Re: OS/2 maintainer? X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 5:36 AM, Paul Smedley wrote: > Wondering if there is anyone still actively maintaining the OS/2 > source code in APR? I was doing it but no, I haven't done anything for quite a long time... > My current apr diff (which needs tidying up) is at > http://smedley.info/apr-1.3.3.diff One comment I'd make is that you seem to be veering away from the original design philosophy which is to always use native API calls in preference to C library functions that emulate unix system calls. This is to maximise performance and control. I'd be against commiting any code that fails to follow this style without a pretty good reason.