Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of arfrever.fta@gmail.com
 designates 72.14.220.152 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to
         :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
        b=MZ6cMf3w9VKQCL2r3YuvI4VSYJnHATEIGVB55w5yD1dxf3T+ZRXOMHU+TSkrZcU5IO
         mBLTYsu8qql+/BIxisemWg+jPnoUMXBj9VXTLERC6W0KeM8bxZBKj5jBhzHaeNOe0WIc
         sfHZIMKy25lf1zNouoRALSt3IKEjSQE875d4o=
From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <arfrever.fta@gmail.com>
To: APR Development <dev@apr.apache.org>
Subject: Re: apr-1.3.6 on linux kernel 2.6.26
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:53:31 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.29-tuxonice-r3-AFTA; KDE/4.2.4; x86_64; ;
 )
Cc: Chetan Reddy <chetanreddy@gmail.com>
References: <125bae360907091054j351ac8d5q7799966424c08636@mail.gmail.com>
 <1247190011.2811.320.camel@shrek.rexursive.com>
In-Reply-To: <1247190011.2811.320.camel@shrek.rexursive.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart2443993.t67ypicWrG";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200907100353.37891.Arfrever.FTA@gmail.com>

--nextPart2443993.t67ypicWrG
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

2009-07-10 03:40:11 Bojan Smojver napisa=C5=82(a):
> On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 13:54 -0400, Chetan Reddy wrote:
> > apr builds on my machine(debian testing using kernel 2.6.26) with
> > HAVE_EPOLL_CREATE1 even though the function isn't implemented on my
> > system (it's only available since 2.6.27[1]). this causes httpd(with
> > worker mpm) to segault on startup.
> >=20
> > configure.in in apr-1.3.6 checks for epoll_create1 using
> > AC_CHECK_FUNCS . Instead, should it have a check similar to the check
> > for epoll_create? i can create a patch if someone can confirm that
> > this is indeed the problem.
>=20
> Looks like glibc is playing tricks on us. Anyone knows of the rationale
> of having a non-implemented function in glibc?

Maybe glibc has been built with headers of newer version of kernel
than currently used kernel.

=2D-=20
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis

--nextPart2443993.t67ypicWrG
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkpWnyEACgkQIEGVSeBq/j7vkwCcCzxVtQC8ToLYCtcrPxrSr4Et
WdMAoJKcc8W7/x1E/TDsXSvFckvW0JnB
=BNtZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2443993.t67ypicWrG--