From dev-return-22059-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Wed Jul 22 05:27:20 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 70945 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2009 05:27:20 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Jul 2009 05:27:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 13368 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 05:28:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 13276 invoked by uid 500); 22 Jul 2009 05:28:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 13268 invoked by uid 99); 22 Jul 2009 05:28:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:28:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of rhys.ulerich@gmail.com designates 209.85.132.249 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.132.249] (HELO an-out-0708.google.com) (209.85.132.249) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2009 05:28:16 +0000 Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id d14so1679271and.13 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:27:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=sGs4o8QCuKgaBJVkMFkIAy0FANdvaM/oreG5SFGd/l0=; b=BgvfOsVrSQfX+xOCTdUXrp/QvLJqjdboDDMAbfM9HIiKVzPuLHBL2VKEcWrsq9DJdL E57YJ0le1ykJFcYHSlw9t9tms5vHZiKVVXAxSQJ+1HTJPTdsf5cIQPIB2xqttRgVASwH t1q9mjaT2Hb7OH3V6EEgck74jc9ZgTsufJSM8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZAKEhJjiRnzfJqAHfSjIVxmfsnok7sEf/2C2rUE04CO4DAyJByx+y/ssCESfnQVqnz 4qlPswh9wSqKg+e66RAv0ytR9IERnL/4W4P+6QYSbuxsSdDrt9l98SdMKfXdqne0mXRv y0OlBTpzjee/2RIIoQ+B8WnawV2A2ArR8do0k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.239.4 with SMTP id m4mr694524anh.76.1248240475091; Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:27:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1248220621.31747.64.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> References: <8039218E-58CC-4ABA-899C-2BFF8D78A928@jaguNET.com> <4A660900.1070402@apache.org> <4A661F9C.3030206@sharp.fm> <4a00655d0907211434r660fa6c9o6d9188481d78974@mail.gmail.com> <1248220621.31747.64.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> From: Rhys Ulerich Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 00:27:35 -0500 Message-ID: <4a00655d0907212227y70e0ef8dv7c6e82be42f2e478@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release APR 1.3.7 To: Bojan Smojver Cc: Apache Portable Runtime Development Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org >> Not sure what to make of these. ldd shows that all executables in >> test/ can find the dynamic libraries, including libimf.so, correctly. > > When you say that ldd is fine with the whole thing - do you have > LD_LIBRARY_PATH set at all somewhere or not? BTW, where is your > libimf.so? LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set in my environment. libimf.so is in a nonstandard directory present in LD_LIBRARY_PATH. ldd finds libimf.so because it is in my LD_LIBRARY_PATH. I'm aftraid I can't give more solid answers than these-- due to some recent LDAP updates at my university, tonight I cannot SSH into to the system that gave me problems, and I am flying out for six days tomorrow morning. I believe the problems are related to my environment. Can anyone else with Intel''s icc weigh in here? - Rhys