Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93797 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2009 00:49:58 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2009 00:49:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 49832 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 00:50:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 49717 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jun 2009 00:50:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 49661 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jun 2009 00:50:04 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:50:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bojan@rexursive.com designates 150.101.121.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [150.101.121.179] (HELO beauty.rexursive.com) (150.101.121.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:49:56 +0000 Received: from [10.1.120.24] (shrek.rexursive.com [10.1.120.24]) by beauty.rexursive.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8C48C42D for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:49:35 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: svn commit: r783970 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.4.x: ./ file_io/netware/ file_io/unix/ include/arch/unix/ network_io/unix/ poll/unix/ From: Bojan Smojver To: dev@apr.apache.org In-Reply-To: <1244779399.2334.50.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> References: <20090612032125.948A72388891@eris.apache.org> <1244777160.2334.48.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> <1244779399.2334.50.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 10:49:34 +1000 Message-Id: <1245199774.2334.210.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.2 (2.26.2-1.fc11) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 14:03 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote: > On Fri, 2009-06-12 at 13:26 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote: > > Before we even contemplate having this in 1.3.x > > And if you want to play with it in 1.3.x, here is the patch. It should > save you some conflict resolution. Just wanted to gather opinions from the list on this once again. We are talking about CLOEXEC patch for 1.3.x. I would like to see if there are any -1 votes for this, so that we can put the proposal to rest for this particular branch. -- Bojan