From dev-return-21847-apmail-apr-dev-archive=apr.apache.org@apr.apache.org Wed Jun 10 08:11:29 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 43440 invoked from network); 10 Jun 2009 08:11:29 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 10 Jun 2009 08:11:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 96822 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2009 08:11:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-apr-dev-archive@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 96756 invoked by uid 500); 10 Jun 2009 08:11:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@apr.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@apr.apache.org Received: (qmail 96742 invoked by uid 99); 10 Jun 2009 08:11:38 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:11:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bojan@rexursive.com designates 150.101.121.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [150.101.121.179] (HELO beauty.rexursive.com) (150.101.121.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 08:11:30 +0000 Received: from [10.1.120.24] (shrek.rexursive.com [10.1.120.24]) by beauty.rexursive.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A28F28C012; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:11:08 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: Odd thing in apr_procattr_io_set From: Bojan Smojver To: "William A. Rowe, Jr." Cc: Ruediger Pluem , APR Developer List In-Reply-To: <4A2EB8FC.3020305@rowe-clan.net> References: <4A2EB423.8010706@apache.org> <4A2EB8FC.3020305@rowe-clan.net> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 18:11:08 +1000 Message-Id: <1244621468.25532.179.camel@shrek.rexursive.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.2 (2.26.2-1.fc11) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, 2009-06-09 at 14:33 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > Shouldn't this be == above like in the case for the output file > descriptors? > > Sure looks that way. Worthy of a quick release (if it's the cause of fd leaks)? If we combine that with APU's --libs thing and the (uncommitted) DSO race patches, maybe we should roll 1.3.6/1.3.8 ASAP? -- Bojan