apr-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ruediger Pluem <rpl...@apache.org>
Subject Re: svn commit: r783970 - in /apr/apr/branches/1.4.x: ./ file_io/netware/ file_io/unix/ include/arch/unix/ network_io/unix/ poll/unix/
Date Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:08:17 GMT

On 06/19/2009 07:53 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 00:26 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> I don't have an objection, it seems you thought this out, but I don't
>> always seem to have a buy in over what is "compatibility" - you might
>> want the opinion of one or more port maintainers ;)
> OK, I'll be waiting for more opinions on this. Thank you for yours!
> The "thought out" bit for me here boils down to this:
> ----------------
> If an fd was opened through APR API and it was not marked to be
> inherited or without cleanup, then it should not be available in the
> child process to apps that call fork() directly. The present situation,

I guess you mean exec instead of fork here correct?
Its finally a patch about CLOEXEC.



View raw message